Often overlooked in a fiduciary analysis of any DC Lifetime Income Program are the impacts arising from the method in which any accumulated lifetime income guarantee is being distributed from any particular program. There are substantial differences between any of the available methods, and the impact of each of them on any participant. They really
We have all been well attuned over the decades since mutual funds became available to be daily traded under DC plans to a very particular view of an investment funds’ cost. ERISA’s participant investment disclosure rules have successfully established what I best described as a certain “language,” which permits any participant or fiduciary to assess
![IMG_2559[7]](https://www.businessofbenefits.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/832/2026/06/IMG_25597-e1780943848202.jpeg)
AI’s limitations became pretty apparent after yet another delightful and “robust,” shall we say, conversation with an old friend, an economist, about intriguing ideas on how to universally effectuate, accumulate and port lifetime income guarantees derived from employment. That conversation got granular, as it often does, with voices raising over details of certain innovative infrastructure
“No Duh!”was my favorite response by a colleague to the DOL’s alt asset proposed regulation, which is replete with references to the need of the fiduciary adviser to “read and critically review” the core documents of any of a plan’s investments. That proposed reg does grant plan sponsors some grace, only requiring that they (who
An important and separate “tool,” if you will, in the professional’s portfolio for use in assessing and understanding the manner in which any lifetime income program will fit into any particular DC plan is simply recognizing that annuities (1) are a necessary element of providing lifetime guarantees under DC plans; (2) are normal; (3) have
![IMG_2337[73]](https://www.businessofbenefits.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/832/2025/04/IMG_233773.jpg)
Engineering, analytical and operations. These are the three distinct and dynamic categories (“stacks”, perhaps?) of knowledge into which the lifetime income markets seem to be organizing itself-out of necessity, I would argue.
We’ve known for a very long time that transforming defined contribution plans into vehicles which facilitate the accumulation and distribution of income
The DOL’s most recent advisory opinion, 2025-04, helpfully affirms two separate legal principles upon which many of the defined contribution lifetime income programs being offered in the market currently rely. The AO is also very useful in the manner in which DOL describes one very specific program, the LIS program offered by Alliance Bernstein, offering
As part of the DOL’s efforts under Executive Order 14192, titled Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation (90 FR 9065, Feb. 6, 2025), the Department undertook to withdraw two seemingly innocuous annuity regulations which, by any cursory review, appeared to have outlived their usefulness. I would suspect that most of us didn’t give those withdrawals a second
If any company in the United States wants to sell you a guarantee that- in return for a premium- they will make monthly payments to you for as long as you are alive, that company simply needs a license from a state to do so.
This really-not-so-simple requirement actually has massive implications. Licensure is a